In the complex world of investments, disputes are not uncommon. When they arise, investors need reliable, experienced counsel to navigate the waters of Securities Litigation and Arbitration. Whether you’re a first-time investor or an experienced financier, understanding these processes is crucial in protecting your investments and rights. This guide is intended to demystify the concepts of Securities Litigation and Arbitration, making them accessible and understandable, so you can confidently proceed when such disputes occur. At Harrison, we’re not just a law firm; we’re your partners in securing financial justice. Our team of skilled attorneys possesses the knowledge and experience to guide you through these challenging situations, ensuring you’re never left navigating the rough seas of securities disputes alone. Take the first step towards safeguarding your investments. Read on to learn more about Securities Litigation and Arbitration and the crucial role an adept law firm plays in these proceedings.

Understanding Securities Litigation & Arbitration

Securities litigation and arbitration are legal mechanisms that resolve disputes in the investment industry. But what exactly do they entail?

Securities Litigation is a field of law where disputes related to investments and securities are resolved in court. It involves proceedings in state or federal courts and can range from individual actions to complex class action lawsuits. Investors, brokers, advisors, and other individuals and entities involved in buying and selling securities may find themselves in a securities litigation proceeding, due to issues like fraud, insider trading, stock manipulation, and more.
Securities Arbitration, on the other hand, is a private alternative to public litigation. In this process, a neutral third-party arbitrator or panel of arbitrators, often under the auspices of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), decides the outcome of a dispute. Arbitration can be quicker and less formal than court litigation, making it a preferred choice for many in the industry.

However, the path between litigation and arbitration can be nuanced and requires the guidance of seasoned professionals. At Harrison, we have a deep understanding of the pros and cons of both processes, helping you choose the best route for your situation.

The Essential Role of an Attorney in Securities Litigation & Arbitration and Threshold Issues

When dealing with securities litigation and arbitration, the role of an attorney is indispensable. These disputes are complex, necessitating a deep understanding of financial regulations, market operations, and securities law. Moreover, threshold issues in securities litigation often arise – primarily identifying whether an investment contract that falls under United States securities laws exists.

In determining this, the court applies the four factors established in the United States Supreme Court case SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., colloquially known as the “Howey Test.” An investment is considered an investment contract under this test if it involves:

An investment of money;
In a common enterprise;
With the expectation of profit and
To be derived from the efforts of others.

These threshold issues can be challenging to apply, especially to evolving financial instruments like cryptocurrencies. With cases showing differing rulings by the SEC regarding different cryptocurrencies, having an experienced attorney by your side becomes essential.

Here's how our legal counsel makes a difference:

Case Preparation: Our experienced attorneys gather necessary information, identify potential witnesses, and build a strong case to best represent your rights.
Legal Strategy: We devise tailored legal strategies based on each client's unique circumstances and the specifics of the case.
Negotiation and Advocacy: Our team negotiates settlement terms and, if necessary, passionately advocates for our clients in the court or arbitration hearing.
Post-Arbitration Guidance: We continue to advise and assist clients even after the arbitration decision, including exploring potential avenues for recovery.

Whether you’re an investor seeking restitution or a broker defending your practice, Harrison’s proficient legal counsel can be a valuable asset. We combine deep legal knowledge with extensive experience to deliver effective representation.

Get in touch with us today to discuss your securities litigation and arbitration needs.

Elements of a Securities Fraud Claim

In any type of civil litigation, including securities fraud, a claim’s success hinges on whether all elements of the claim have been adequately proven. A 10b-5 claim, which is a common type of securities fraud claim, must meet the following elements:

Material Omission or Misrepresentation: This pertains to false or misleading statements or omissions that would influence a reasonable investor's decision.
Scienter (Knowledge): The defendant must have known that the statement was false or misleading or acted in reckless disregard of the truth.
Nexus between the Omission/Misrepresentation and the Purchase or Sale of Securities: The misleading information must have influenced the investor's decision to buy or sell securities.
Reliance on the Omission/Misrepresentation for the Transaction Decision: The investor relied on the misleading information when deciding to engage in the transaction.
Economic Losses: The investor suffered a financial loss as a result of the transaction.
Loss Causation: The investor's loss must be directly linked to the misleading information.

For example, if a broker falsely claims that a company has developed a way to significantly reduce production costs, this misinformation could be considered material because it has the potential to impact the company’s stock price.

As these elements indicate, proving a securities fraud claim can be complex, requiring detailed knowledge of securities laws and litigation procedures. Hiring a seasoned securities litigation attorney can significantly enhance your chances of successfully proving these elements.

At Harrison, we bring a wealth of experience and a deep understanding of securities laws to the table, giving you the best possible chance of success in your securities fraud claim. We are well-versed in the intricacies of the 10b-5 claim and other types of securities fraud claims, and we are prepared to vigorously fight for your rights.

If you suspect that you’ve been a victim of securities fraud, don’t hesitate to contact Harrison for a free consultation. Our experienced attorneys are ready to help you navigate your claim and fight for the justice you deserve.

The Importance of Rule 10b-5

Under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, Rule 10b-5 was instituted to tackle securities fraud. This regulation forbids anyone in the securities industry from employing deceptive measures, making false statements, omitting relevant information, or conducting business in any manner that might defraud a person, directly or indirectly. Rule 10b-5 has been a bedrock for securities fraud investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and has undergone multiple amendments over the years.

A few examples of Rule 10b-5 violations include:

Creative Accounting: Concealing losses or low revenue by manipulating financial statements.
False Statements: Making false assertions to artificially inflate stock prices.
Insider Trading: Trading based on non-public, material information.

Further, Rule 10b5-1 explicitly addresses insider trading, defining it as “trading based on material nonpublic information (MNP)” and stipulates that the person must be aware of the information while engaging in a sale or purchase of securities. Rule 10b5-2 clarifies that one does not need to be an insider to be guilty of insider trading. Anyone who obtains nonpublic, material information and executes a trade based on it can be charged under the “misappropriation theory.”

Understanding the nuances of Rule 10b-5 and its implications is a critical part of securities litigation. At Harrison, our team of expert attorneys, backed by years of experience and extensive legal knowledge, is prepared to guide you through these complexities, ensuring you understand your rights and the potential ramifications of a Rule 10b-5 violation.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA) and the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA)

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA) was introduced to combat the influx of frivolous securities class-action lawsuits that were becoming increasingly common. The Act imposes strict pleading requirements and includes provisions intended to discourage unwarranted litigation. These include:

Specific Allegations in Pleadings: The plaintiff must specify in their initial pleadings what is false or misleading, and why it is false and misleading, before any discovery is exchanged.
Caps on Damages: The PSLRA places limits on the damages that can be awarded in securities fraud cases.
Stays of Discovery: The Act allows for a stay of discovery while motions to dismiss are being resolved.

In response to attorneys attempting to bypass these provisions by bringing their claims under state rather than federal law, the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA) was passed in 1998. SLUSA established federal courts as the exclusive forum for most securities fraud class action cases.

The courts have strictly enforced SLUSA, dismissing cases that appear to be securities litigation dressed as contract breaches or those involving securities listed on national exchanges. As a result, securities litigation has become a highly specialized field, necessitating the guidance of an experienced securities litigation attorney.

Navigating the complexities of the PSLRA and SLUSA can be challenging. Harrison’s team of seasoned attorneys, equipped with in-depth knowledge of securities laws, is ready to guide you through these intricate legal frameworks. Our goal is to maximize your chances of success in any securities litigation or class-action suit.

Concerned about a securities issue? Reach out to Harrison today for a free consultation. We are committed to protecting your rights and ensuring you get the justice you deserve.

Understanding FINRA's Role in Securities Arbitration

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) plays a critical role in the securities industry, providing oversight and enforcing regulatory compliance among brokers and brokerage firms. A significant part of FINRA’s mission is to protect investors by ensuring fair practices in the securities industry.

Securities arbitration before FINRA is one of the primary dispute resolution mechanisms available to investors who have grievances against their brokers or brokerage firms. Here’s how FINRA contributes to the arbitration process:

Administration of Dispute Resolution: FINRA manages the dispute resolution process, providing a forum for investors and securities professionals to settle their disputes through arbitration.
Panel Selection: FINRA facilitates the selection of arbitrators who have the necessary knowledge and experience to adjudicate securities disputes.
Enforcement of Arbitration Awards: Once the arbitration panel makes a final ruling in favor of one party or another, FINRA ensures the enforcement of the arbitration awards.

Contact us today to learn more about how we can help you with your securities arbitration case before FINRA.

Schedule a FREE and Confidential Consultation

Case / Defendant(Required)

Full Name(Required)

Email(Required)

State(Required)

Telephone Number(Required)

Value of Your Monetary Loss(Required)

Brief Description of Your Potential Lawsuit(Required)